Not the form you were looking for?
-
-
-
-
2) No other information currently exists or being investigated that may reasonably indicate that any additional information will change my conclusion that the claimant is unable to operate certain machinery without serious risk of physical injury. 3) I understand no claim has been filed on behalf of either the claimant or the claimant's family. 4) A NOSH test has been performed on the claimant, and the number on the label is a valid number for the test. If this number is not valid for any of the machinery tested and the claimant has been granted a NOSH certificate to practice law, then no certificate of completion of the NOSH test is valid for any machinery tested. 5) The claimant's NOSH label can be used for a valid NOSH label only for machinery subject to a valid NOSH test. 6) Neither I nor any legal representative of the claimant have or shall have actual knowledge of any additional information regarding the validity of the claimant or his family. 7) This form must be completed by a claimant. 8) This form should be signed by the claimant in a court or federal courtroom, and the claimant's signature cannot be forged. (Signature must have a full name, date and place of birth, address, and signature.) 9) In the event we are able to determine that any other information provided in a claim for relief that does not match the form, either on the same or in some case any subsequent claim, the claimant will be notified and a new NOSH label may be applied.
SUMMARY OF THE INVESTIGATIVE RESULTS
The NOSH investigation results (Document 4) show an assessment by the NOSH Administrator that the claimant's NOSH testing results on machines were not consistent with his diagnosis of the claimants medical condition:
(D) Assessment of NOSH Testing Results
Based upon an analysis of the claimant's NOSH testing results for the NOSH machine (Document 4), the NOSH Administrator found that many machines do not have calibration marks to allow verification of operator compliance with the machine's operational controls. The Administrator found that a sufficient number of machines used by the claimant did not require NOSH testing because of the accuracy of the claimant's NOSH testing results.
In determining the number of machines with accuracy-related calibration marks, the Administrator compared the total number of tests performed to the total number of machines tested against the number of machines specified in NOSH guidance to perform tests.
